Pass the California Bar

Just another WordPress site

  • Subjects
    • Torts
    • Contracts
    • Criminal Law

10 Aug 2015

Important Tort Cases to Know

 

The following are some significant Tort cases that every student studying for the Bar should be familiar with.

Garratt v. Dailey, 46 Wash. 2d 197, 279 P.2d 1091

  • Intent (Substantial Certainty)

Hackbart v Cincinnati Bengals, Inc. 601 F.2d 516, 444 U.S. 931

  • Consent

Henningsen v Bloomfield Motors, Inc. (1960) 32 N.J. 358, 161 A.2d 69

Hustler Magazine v Falwell (1988) S.Ct. 870

Larson v St. Francis Hotel 83 Cal.App.2d 210, 188 P.2d 513

  • Negligence

Li v Yellow Cab Co. of California (1975) 13 Cal.3d 804, 119 Cal. Rptr. 858

  • Comparative Negligence

MacPherson v Buick motor Co. (1916) 217 N.Y. 382, 111 N.E. 1050

  • Products

New York Times v Sullivan (1964) 376 U.S. 254, 84 S.Ct. 710

Palsgraf v Long Island Railroad Co. 248 N.Y. 339, 162 N.E. 99

  • Unforeseeable Consequences

Philadelphia Electric Company v Hercules, Inc. (1985) 762 F.2d 303

  • Nuisance

Tarasoff v Regents of University of California (1976) 17 Cal.3d 425 131 Cal Rptr. 14

  • Failure to Act

Rowland v Christianson (1968) 69 Cal.2d 108, 70 Cal.Rptr. 97

  • Premise Liability

Rylands v Fletcher (1865) 3 H & C 774, 159 English Rep. 737

  • Strict Liability

Summers v Tice Supreme Court of California (1948) 33 Cal.2d 80 199 P.2d 1

  • Problems re: which Party Caused the Harm

 

 

 

 

Filed Under: Torts Tagged With: cases, Court, Court Cases, Notes, torts

The next California Bar Exam is in:

days
0
-341
-6
hours
0
-7
minutes
-4
0
seconds
-2
-8

Copyright © 2025 · Whitespace Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in